10.7 10.7.1 |
|||
|
|||
There are times when we might wish to test vocabulary formally. One such situation would be at the beginning of a course, when learners need to be placed into classes at appropriate levels. Such placement tests do not sample a particular syllabus, but test a candidate's general range of vocabulary. Another common situation occurs at the end of a course, or at the end of a number of units in a course, when we wish to gauge the progress that learners have made in their vocabulary acquisition. Such tests of progress or achievement can be specific, and can sample discrete items of vocabulary that we have taught thus far (see Module 14, section 14.1.1 on these different purposes of testing). Schmitt (2000: 163-80) has a readable chapter on test factors that are relevant to language teachers. He divides test types into two camps: those that seek to test how 'broad' a learner's vocabulary knowledge is, in terms of the 'size' of vocabulary; and those that test how 'deep' a learner's vocabulary knowledge is. Here are two test items of the 'breadth' type:
And here are two test items of the 'depth' type:
(Examples from Schmitt, 2000: 168, 170, 172) Schmitt refers to Henrickson (1999), who gives three dimensions of vocabulary development that are relevant to vocabulary testing:
We might also add whether to test by written or oral means, whether to test using contextualized or decontextualized language, and whether to test formally or informally. There has also been a lot of work done recently on online vocabulary testing, of which DIALANG (2002) is perhaps the most interesting. |
|||
|
|||