Norm-referenced
assessments are those in which result boundaries are not fixed but are determined
by a comparison of how students in a particular cohort have performed relative
to each other. For example, it might be decided that in a given exam the
top 10% of the resultant marks are to be classified as 'A', 30% as 'B',
35% as 'C', 20% as 'D' and 5% as 'E'. Just by knowing that a student scored,
say, 82%, we would not be able to tell whether he/she had got an 'A', 'B',
or whatever. It is only the overall ranking, ie the student's performance
relative to the rest of the cohort, that would give us this information.
This was the system employed in UK public exams several years ago before
the advent of GCSEs, and it is still used in those areas of the country
that employ 11+ or school entrance exams: there are a certain number of
places available and therefore only the top x% will be successful and the
minimum mark required to ensure success will vary from year to year. Generally
speaking, other than in such highly competitive circumstances where places
are strictly limited, norm-referencing is now both less common and less
desirable. |