4.6.5
Feedback and evaluation |
|
|
|
4.6.5.1
Formative feedback 4.6.5.1
Formative feedback Formative evaluation can be carried out formally, with questionnaires or designated feedback sessions in class time, or via an elected class representative, but there is a danger with some of these methods (especially questionnaires) of the students getting 'feedback fatigue' if they are done too often. I favour much quicker, less 'scientific' but also less obtrusive techniques, like giving each student a small-size sticky note during class and asking them write down their impressions of that class, or a particular activity, for collection at the end of class. These little notes are great because students don't sign them, so they are more likely to be frank, and the small size means they feel free to write anything from a single word (or sometimes just a smiley face) to several sentences in very tiny writing on both sides. You can ask for very focused feedback, eg 'For the game we have just done, please give the game three scores by writing 3 numbers on your sticky note: the first score is for how much you enjoyed it, 0 = not at all, 3 = a lot (and 1 and 2 are somewhere in between); the second score is for how useful it was for your learning, 0 = not at all, 3 = very useful, the third score is for how much you want to do this sort of game again in class, 0 = never again, 3 = a lot'; or 'Please write down one suggestion to help me make your classes better' (Once when I did this several students said 'Please speak more slowly' - a very clear message!). Sometimes I take a quick class vote after an activity or set of activities, especially if they are new, on whether the activity was useful and if we should do this sort of activity again. I also chat to students during and outside class about which sorts of activity they enjoy, or find helpful, like least, and why, etc. If I have done a sticky-note feedback I usually write a letter to the class (in the target language, with a copy for each student), summarizing the things they said, and telling them what I will try to do in response, or explaining why I feel I can't do anything. This is a wonderful authentic reading text for the students, and they are usually highly motivated to read it. It also does wonders for teacher-student rapport, as students can see that their opinions and ideas are being taken seriously.
4.6.5.3
Feedback and action research 4.6.5.4
Summative feedback These are nearly always done by a questionnaire, often in a standard format designed for use across the institution. These evaluations are normally conducted for purposes of accountability, to measure overall 'customer satisfaction' and to be presented to auditors conducting teaching quality assessments. However, they can be seen as part of a longer term process of formative evaluation from one course to the next, assuming the teacher involved is allowed to see them or is at least given a copy of the collated results (this doesn't always happen automatically - you may have to ask!), and that the types of questions asked give sufficiently informative responses on which to form the basis of future action. For example, an average 'satisfaction' score of 3.2, calculated from 12 responses to a rating scale of 1 (low) to 5 (high), tells you only that on average the class was reasonably satisfied with the course. It does not tell you which aspects were very satisfactory and which were less so, or why, or even whether most students were very satisfied but that the two who never actually came to class gave very low scores, dragging the average down. For these kinds of reason I tend to treat end of course evaluations that were designed and conducted more for administrative purposes than for real feedback on teaching with some degree of scepticism. However, they are at their best a serious attempt to monitor and improve teaching standards across an institution, so they should not be dismissed as irrelevant. If you want to maximize your chances of getting good end-of-course evaluations from your students, the unobtrusive collection of regular formative feedback and action on this is an excellent idea!
|
|
|
|