It is claimed by many, although
little documented in research literature, that for most learners the practice
of providing selected vocabulary in the margin or, indeed, of learners
doing the same for themselves by writing meanings in above the line (glossing,
as it is often called), has no significant effect on vocabulary learning.
Clearly, unglossed texts are more natural and are closer to 'real' reading,
encouraging learners to look for contextual clues rather than relying
on supplied definitions, while glossed texts interrupt readers' flow and
concentration. However, at low to intermediate levels of L2 proficiency
the main objective must be to give learners the opportunity to read intrinsically
interesting texts and thereby to help them catch the L2 'reading bug',
something which owing to their chronic shortage of vocabulary they cannot
do without the aid of glossing.
Reflective task 10
Find target language
texts suitable for use as comprehension passages at each of the
following three levels:
- learners one year
into an ab-initio course (c. 400 words);
- first-year post-A
level learners (c. 700 words);
- final-year post-A
level learners (c. 1000 words).
Identify in your chosen
texts:
- all the words that
students could readily ignore when reading the text for general
meaning;
- words whose meaning
they might access via formal features and the procedures that
would help them do this;
- words whose meaning
they could guess through contextual clues.
If your chosen text
does not offer many instances of (c), consider how you might adapt
it to provide more contextual clues for learners.
|
|