4.3.2.1
Reflection
4.3.2.2 Belief check
4.3.2.3 Tips for task design
4.3.2.4 Reflection on tasks
4.3.2.5 General success features
4.3.2.6 Benefits of tasks
4.3.2.7 Reflection
4.3.2.8 The essential conditions for SLA and tasks
4.3.2.9 Reflection on task
4.3.2.10 Classroom management and teacher roles
4.3.2.11 Interim summary
4.3.2.12 Optional reading / assessment task
4.3.2.1
Reflection
Think of an activity that went well in one of your recent lessons (preferably
one that fits the definition of task established in activity cycle
2 - see 4.2.2.3). Spend a minute brainstorming
and jot down all the positive aspects of the activity.
Back
to top
4.3.2.2
Belief check
What do you believe are the qualities of a successful task?
You may like to do this as
a 'mind map', like the one I've started here for the 'mystery objects
task' described in activity cycle 2 of this module (see 4.2.3).
Alternatively, just make a note-form list.

Figure 4.1 Mind
map of positive aspects of the 'mystery objects' task
When I made this example I
started with the obvious things, like students being motivated (in rectangular
boxes) then added reasons why these had happened (in hexagonal
shapes), the immediate classroom effects (oval
shapes) and the longer term pedagogic benefits (star bursts).
Back
to top
4.3.2.3
Tips for task design
Jane Willis offers six tips for designing effective tasks. How do they
compare with those on your mind map or list?
JW04
Tip 1
I think the topic of the task needs to hold a bit of interest for the
students.
JW05
Tip 2
I think it's very important for the instructions to be very specific.
And what we have found when we've been doing task recordings working with
native speakers sometimes, in fact very often with native speakers, that
if you set a task which is rather open ended and general people tend to
'umm' and 'ah' a lot and wonder what they're supposed to be talking about,
so I think one of the most important things is to think of instructions
- make sure they know when they've finished the task, so 'Find seven differences',
or 'Talk to your partner about where your grandparents live and see if
you can find two things in common'.
JW06
Tip 3
Always try your task instructions out on someone else, even if it's just
a colleague in the staff room, better still, two colleagues. Give them
the written instructions and ask them if they can do the task in one minute
or two minutes, however long you think it will take them, and if they
turn round and say,' Hey, what do you mean by this?' you know you have
to change the task instructions.
JW07
Tip 4
And my fourth tip is to always set a time limit!
JW08
Tip 5
One thing I will say that, talking of time limits, that if you set too
long a time limit and it drags out, that's when your unmotivated pupils
really start thinking, 'Oh, what are we supposed to be doing now!' So
stopping it once maybe half the class have finished?
JW09
Tip 6
If you can get someone to record the task then that would actually be
a good idea because then you've got some data to work on, then you know
the kind of language that is natural to come up in the task, and that
helps you to prepare a nice pre-task phase. And if you can get two sets
of people to do it that's even better.
Back
to top
4.3.2.4
Reflection on tasks
After completing the task, spend a few minutes considering the pros and
cons of doing this type of brainstorming task, where you start individually
and then combine your ideas with a partner's, or compare your ideas with
someone else's (Jane's).
Back
to top
4.3.2.5
General success features
Many of the items on your mind map probably describe aspects of any
successful classroom activity, regardless of whether it would conform
to the definition of task we have adopted here. These are features like:
- Immediate motivation
(see 4.1.2)
- Interesting topic -
ie interesting to students!
- Intrigue, challenge
or fun - solve a problem or mystery, win a game;
- Variety / novelty -
or at least not overusing a technique or material so that it loses
its appeal;
- Level of difficulty
- doable but not too easy, so worth doing and gives sense of achievement;
- Timing - doesn't go
on too long so students get bored or tired;
- Clear, simple instructions
- students don't get confused and lose interest;
- ...
- Organizational factors
- Not too complex or time
consuming to prepare or use - efficient use of classroom time;
- Clearly related to syllabus
/ lesson aims / progression of activities;
- ...
- Pedagogic factors
- Clear objectives - to
both teacher and students;
- Facilitates learning
of aspect(s) of target language;
- Fosters effective learning
strategies / learner training;
- ...
- ...
(For further discussion on
a closely related area, see Skehan (1998:
142-45) on 'task usefulness')
To be successful, a task, like
any other activity, should be designed with these factors in mind. But
a well-designed task can offer additional benefits over many traditional
language classroom activities.
Back
to top
4.3.2.6
Benefits of tasks
In the example mind map I included three pedagogic benefits of
doing the 'mystery objects' task. In your mind map or list, you may well
have thought of more, or a different set.
Compare yours with Jane Willis's
(1996: 35-36) list of eight advantages
to students of doing tasks in pairs or groups, summarized in the table
below.
Next, rank these benefits in
order of importance for your students, with 1 being the most important
benefit and 8 being the least important. (You can give two or more benefits
equal ranking if you wish.)
Benefit |
Rank |
- It gives learners
confidence to try out whatever language they know, or think they
know, in the relative privacy of a pair or small group, without
fear of being wrong or of being corrected in front of the class.
|
|
- It gives learners
experience of spontaneous interaction, which involves composing
what they want to say in real time, formulating phrases and units
of meaning, while listening to what is being said.
|
|
- It gives learners
a chance to benefit from noticing how others express similar meanings.
Research shows they can successfully provide corrective feedback
to each other (when encouraged to do so), without learning each
other's errors (Lightbown and Spada, 1999:148; Porter, 1983, cited
in Nunan, 1999: 52)
|
|
- It gives all learners
chances to practise negotiating turns to speak, initiating as
well as responding to questions, and reacting to other's contributions
(whereas in teacher-led interaction, they only have a responding
role).
|
|
- It engages learners
in using language purposefully and co-operatively, concentrating
on building meaning, not just using language for display purposes.
|
|
- It makes learners
participate in a complete interaction, not just one-off sentences.
Negotiating openings and closings, new stages or changes of direction
are their responsibility. It is likely that discourse skills such
as these can only be acquired through interaction.
|
|
- It gives learners
more chances to try out communication strategies like checking
understanding, paraphrasing to get round an unknown word, reformulating
other people's ideas, and supplying words and phrases for other
speakers.
|
|
- It helps learners
gradually gain confidence as they find they can rely on co-operation
with their fellow students to achieve the goals of the tasks mainly
through use of the target language.
|
|
Back
to top
4.3.2.7
Reflection
- After completing the task
in 4.3.2.6, spend a few minutes considering the
pros and cons of this type of consensus discussion task where there
is no key or answer supplied (because there is no single right answer.)
- To what extent do the activities
you use in your existing approach to teaching give your students the
benefits listed above? For example, how often do your students get opportunities
to initiate interactions?
Back
to top
4.3.2.8
The essential conditions for SLA and tasks
A successful task will provide many, if not all of these benefits for
language students. It will also fulfil the three essential conditions
for language acquisition set out in activity cycle 1 (motivation, exposure
and language use, see 4.1). In fact each of the
beneficial features of tasks listed here helps in some way to fulfil one
or more of these three essential conditions.
- For each of the summarized
benefits listed below, look at the 'How?' column which shows how tasks
can offer these benefits. Two of the 'Hows?' have been transposed; which
two should be swapped over to make sense?
- Next, decide which of the
three essential conditions for SLA, motivation, exposure
and language use, is provided for.

Beneficial feature
|
How?
|
SLA conditions |
- confidence to try
out language
|
- students work in private
in pairs / groups; no error correction
|
|
|
- repeatedly successful
task completion boosts confidence
|
|
- opportunity to learn
from others
|
- to participate, students
must listen to peers and may notice how others express similar
meanings; corrective feedback to each other encouraged
|
|
- negotiating turn-taking,
initiating
|
- not teacher led;
group members are equal participants
|
|
- purposeful, co-operative
language use
|
- teacher expects language
to be used to achieve task goal, not for display; students build
meaning / solve task together in pairs / groups
|
|
- complete and extended
interaction to develop discourse skills
|
- doing a task means
engaging in a complete interaction from start to finish, not just
isolated fragments of language
|
|
- development of communication
strategies
|
- students need to understand
each other and make themselves understood in order to do the task
|
|
- builds confidence
in ability to function in target language
|
- no prior language
preparation; students must work together in real time to complete
task
|
|
|
|
|
For feedback, see Commentary
4.3.1.
Back
to top
4.3.2.9
Reflection on task
After completing the task in 4.3.2.8, spend a few
minutes considering the pros and cons of this type of consensus discussion
task where a correct answer is supplied.
Back
to top
4.3.2.10
Classroom management and teacher roles
Some of the items in the 'How?' column of the previous task have major
implications for the way teachers conduct their lessons, and the roles
that they fulfil.
Before moving to the next activity
you might like to consider how your role might differ from the one you
usually adopt if you start using tasks of the type Jane Willis describes.
We will return to this topic in more detail in activity cycle 4 (see 4.4).
Back
to top
4.3.2.11
Interim summary
To sum up so far: we have now established that to get the most out of
tasks in the language classroom, we need to consider a number of design
factors that we would apply to any classroom activity.
But we have also seen that
to get the full benefit, these tasks have to be designed:
- for private pair or group
work;
- with minimum (or no) teacher
intervention;
- in a way that presupposes
no specific language, but instead sets students a challenging and interesting
goal to encourage them to use the target language as best they can to
achieve that goal with the help of their partner(s).
The result should be that students
use the target language as spontaneously (even if inaccurately) as they
would in a genuine communicative situation outside the classroom. The
task itself may not be of a type that we would use in real contexts, but
the immediate motivation and need to speak that it creates are every bit
as real.
Back
to top
4.3.2.12
Optional reading / assessment task
This would be a good point to do the first optional reading (see 4.3.7,
Reading 1).
You may also like to go straight
to the assessment task (see 4.3.9) for this activity
cycle in order to complete the first part of it.
|