Activity 11
Tasks are not a new technique
in language teaching, and have been around for some time. However,
it is only in recent years that Task-based Learning (TBL) has been
put forward as a complete method in itself.
Typically, tasks have
involved students working in pairs or groups to solve some problem
or other. Very traditional tasks are things like picture-difference
and map-direction activities used in pair situations. What kind
of tasks do you use? What benefits do these offer learners?
Click on 'Commentary'
for feedback.
|
Task-based Learning is the
subject of Module 4 and so will
be discussed only briefly here. TBL uses a topic-based rather than grammatical
syllabus, and asks learners to detect and study language patterns that
appear in their own output. Typically, it will provide a number of tasks
to be carried out around the list of topics; on completion of the tasks,
learners are asked to focus on grammar patterns which emerged during their
own language production. TBL has a learn-while-doing approach, and is
in some ways compatible with Vygotskyan scaffolding, ie the use of prior
knowledge and activity to build new knowledge. For Vygotsky,
the most significant moment
in the course of intellectual development, which gives birth to the
purely human forms of practical and abstract intelligence, occurs when
speech and practical activity, two previously completely independent
lines of development, converge. (Vygotsky, 1978: 24)
The TBL cycle proposed by Willis
(1996), and the role grammar plays in the cycle, is shown in Table 3.1:
|
|
STUDENTS |
TEACHER |
PRE-TASK:
|
|
- note useful words
- prepare individually
|
- introduces task/topic
- helps with useful
words
- ensures task is understood
|
TASK CYCLE:
|
Task
|
- do the task in pairs/small
groups
|
|
|
Planning
|
- prepare report on
task outcome
- rehearse report presentation
|
- acts as language advisor
- helps with report
organization
|
|
Report
|
- present spoken report
to class or circulate written report
|
- acts as chairperson
- gives feedback on
report
|
LANGUAGE FOCUS:
|
Analysis
|
- C-R activities to
identify/process language patterns
|
- reviews analysis activity
- may point out phrases,
patterns
|
|
Practice
|
- practise words, phrases,
and patterns
|
- conducts practice
activities
|
Table 3.1:
the TBL cycle (from Willis, 1996)
For Willis,
The aim of the task is to
create a real purpose for language use and provide a natural context
for language study. Students prepare for the task, report back after
the task and then study the language that arises naturally out of the
task cycle and its accompanying materials. (Willis, 1996: 1)
We can see from this that
there is a focus on form in TBL, but this focus is not predetermined by
any syllabus, but is instead dependent on student production. Like C-R,
TBL is inductive-FOF.
Activity 12
Fill in the table below
to show how the different methodologies (GT, ALM, PPP, C-R, TBL,
Protogrammar) fit into the inductive/deductive clines, and the FOFS
/ FOF / ZERO distinctions.
Click on 'Commentary'
for feedback.
|
|
Inductive |
Deductive |
FOFS |
|
|
FOF |
|
|
ZERO POSITION |
|
|
Table 3.2: methodologies
as inductive / deductive and FOFS / FOF / ZERO
|